Post by BretonPost by JulianBy that token, neither do you have absolutely any knowledge of the
relationshiop between Mugabe and Davis, so anything else you have to
counter with is just biased speculation of its own kind.
You really are rather thick, aren't you, Julian. You seem to be
agreeing with me that since we don't know what the relationship is,
your use of "blood money" is ridiculous.
No, I'm asserting that it's a perfectly reasonable speculation that all
of Davis's wealth can be characterised as ill-gotten gain through his
direct long-time association with members of the Mugage regime. What
part of that are you too stupid to understand?
Post by BretonPost by JulianThere is only one *likely* possibility and that is the one I outlined.
No. The possibility I outlined is also likely too.
No, it's not likely that he "just happened" somehow to be operating at
an enormous profit in Zimbabwe all these years, when most other white
farmers and business people have had property either confiscated, sold
at a loss, or in some cases had to physically flee for their lives.
Post by BretonPost by JulianAs to Chelsy, since she as an adult has chosen to continue living off
the blood money of her father,
Again, you have no basis for assuming that Davy's assets are "blood"
money. I have already indicated that it's possible that Davy might be
involved with a Mugabe minister, but "blood money" is over the top (but
you know that and only wrote it for effect.)
I haven't assumed anything. You have. You're assuming that Davis is in
all likelihood clean of any wrongdoing in being involved with the
Mugabe regime. You're free to speculate, although your speculations
are the ones so desperately over the top.
Post by BretonPost by JulianI don't recall you being similarly outraged when the son of a
Post by Bretonknown gun runner (M. el Fayed) was dating Diana, Princess of Wales. In
that case, there was no doubt that Fayed was a shady character.
How does that gainsay what Chelsy Davis and her father are up to in the
present?
It doesn't. And Chelsy and her father are not necessarily "up to"
anything. I was merely pointing out that because you have chosen to
criticize Harry and not Diana, you are biased again Harry. If you have
specific knowledge of some wrongdoing by Davy (and not just speculation
or assumption) let's hear it.
I never said they were "neccesarily" up to anything. It has nothing to
do with Harry except insofar as I pointed out, he rightly took
responsibility for his own personal actions as an adult but Chelsy
Davis has clearly not. She rushes back and forth between Harare and
London at a moment's notice...usually to party it up or spend some more
blood money on Bond St.. Now, if you know of some specific knoweldge
why she should not be an object of speculation in terms of her own
lifestyle decisions, perhaps you can present it. But you don't.
Post by BretonPost by JulianHowever, since I wasn't the party who decided to make any such
comparison initially in this thread, perhaps you should follow your own
advice and move on and get over it.
Well, I am the one who has asked you and the other Dianamaniacs for
years to accept the fact that Diana is dead, and move on.
Well, since I'[m not a Dianamaniac [sic] your delusions aren't
applicable here any more than the silly comparision between a "gun
runner" who *was* received by the Queen and a blood businessman who has
*never* been received by the Queen. So perhaps you'd be best advised
to follow your own recent advise and move on. This is about the
present royal family, and someone dating a member of the royal family,
nothing else. Get over it if the picture doesn't square well with your
amazingly myopic sycophancy.